🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume nuclear discussions with Washington provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed new appeals had originated from mediators to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is navigating a complex route since Iran does not want be perceived to be proceeding from a position of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states exercised their authority to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in various formats if talks reopen.

Trump last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He said the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were mounted with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Continues the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently tried to dictate their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be viable and stays the final solution to address disagreements, but its standards, rules and principles must be followed."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will receive a answer in the same language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the wake of this assault."